![]() In general the bottom end will roll off a cardioid. After being unsatisfied by what I was getting I had two options: rebuild my room, or try a Trinnov. I used it for two years with my behringer mic measurements. Don't waste your time or money on sonarworks without a microphone with a calibration file you can enter into sonarworks on setup. They are likely showing the response from the best position which likely is close to the Nova like maybe 2 ft or 3 ft. The low end was all wrong with the behringer. The low end from somewhere around 200-300 hz varies with distance from the microphone. The main issue with a cardioid is proximity effect. You can even get good use of the Nova you have. The other is it automatically works with REW to give an accurate read out of SPL values without you having to do additional calibration.īut with you having the Scarlett already, you certainly could use the ECM8000, and I don't know that you'd benefit any meaningful way paying for one of the more expensive models. Two main advantages of the Umik-1 are that it simply plugs into the USB port so less gear if you take it elsewhere. The Beheringer was pretty close to the reference microphone. They considered the Earthworks QTC-1 the reference. Behringer ECM8000 calibration data We offer a calibration service for the well known Behringer ECM8000 If we measured your ECM8000 in our lab, you can download the calibration data by just entering your serial number This. I don't think the Umik was on the market at the time. Here was a measured comparison of several measuring microphones. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |